Business

Ambiguity and design

[Dev Patnaik in Fast Company](http://www.fastcodesign.com/1662575/the-antidote-to-ambiguity):

> It turns out that while large companies and organizations are phenomenally good at managing complexity, they’re actually quite bad at tackling ambiguity.

I’ve joked that my title is “designer” but what I get paid to do is “tolerate ambiguity”. Until I know how to tackle it, I suppose…

Dev goes on to explain the type of person who can tackle ambiguity:

> It’s about having multidisciplinary people — folks who are one-part humanist, one-part technologist and one-part capitalist. When multiple disciplines inhabit the same brain, something magical starts to happen….Twentieth century organizations have become extremely adept at grinding people down to become specialist cogs in their massive machines.

Mark Pincus on making everyone CEOs

Some really interesting stuff in [this interview with the Zynga founder](http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/31/business/31corner.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&ref=business&adxnnlx=1285247019-gq6birhNA76fZ8BrckORLg&pagewanted=all):

> One thing I did at my second company was to put white sticky sheets on the wall, and I put everyone’s name on one of the sheets, and I said, “By the end of the week, everybody needs to write what you’re C.E.O. of, and it needs to be something really meaningful.” And that way, everyone knows who’s C.E.O. of what and they know whom to ask instead of me. And it was really effective. People liked it. And there was nowhere to hide…

> This is another thing I really, really value: being a true meritocracy. The only way people will have the trust to give their all to their job is if they feel like their contribution is recognized and valued. And if they see somebody else higher above them just because of a good résumé, or they see somebody else promoted who they don’t think deserves it, you’re done…

> I ask everybody to write down on Sunday night or Monday morning what are your three priorities for the week, and then on Friday see how you did against them. It’s the only way people can stay focused and not burn out. And if I look at your road map and you have 10 priorities for you and your team, you probably don’t know which of the three matter, and probably none of the 10 are right.

Content and context

> What is context? It’s the operating framework in which the content occurs — the goal, one might say. For example, the design of the Apollo lunar module was content. The goal of landing a man on the moon in nine years was the context. You will get a completely different result from engineers working on a lunar module if the context is "some day we might go to the moon" than if its "were going in nine years.” – Dan Pallotta.

I’ve been trying hard to focus my work energy on deciding context first, rather than immediately jumping to content.

Custom candy bars


Thank you internet.

Good design is messy

[I’ve written about this before](http://www.ryskamp.org/brain/?p=261), but two great articles recently said it even better:

> Don’t try to control or make safe the fumbling, panicky, glorious adventure of discovery. Occasionally, one sees articles that describe how to rationalize this process, how to take the fuzzy front end and give it a nice haircut. This is self-defeating. We should allow the fuzzy front end to be as unkempt and as fuzzy as we can. Long– term growth depends on innovation, and innovation isn’t neat. – [Bill Coyne of 3M, via Bob Sutton](http://bobsutton.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/06/innovation-will-always-have-messy-parts-wisdom-from-ideos-david-kelley-and-3ms-bill-coyne.html)

> If the process of bringing new things to life were a living, breathing organism, it would be a nasty beast! It would be unpredictable. It would consume as much as you dared to feed it. Some days, it would really stink. Yucko! And it would have a tendency to chew up people and spit them out. Most of all, though, it would hairy. Really hairy — think dense forests of tangly, greasy, matted, hair, the likes of which make people run for shampoo, scissors, clippers, straight razors, and a blow dryer…

> But in that fuzziness is an unpredictable wellspring of creativity, which — if left to do what it will in in its own nonlinear way — is the source of the new and the wonderful. Consequently, one must never give in to the temptation to shave the fuzzy hairball that is innovation…

> Understanding how to deal with ambiguity at a personal level is the key to unlocking one’s creative confidence. An organization which understands how to resist shaving the hairball, populated by people who know how to orbit the hairball, will be capable of bringing amazing things to life. – [Diego Rodriguez](http://metacool.typepad.com/metacool/2010/06/metacool-innovation-principle-18.html)

Tim O’Reilly on money and business

“Money is like gasoline during a road trip. You don’t want to run out of gas on your trip, but you’re not doing a tour of gas stations. You have to pay attention to money, but it shouldn’t be about the money.” – Tim OReilly: The Oracle of Silicon Valley, Page 4.

How to enrage and alienate your customers

Take an abundant, desirable, free resource and dangle it in front of them for hours without sharing, while hiding your reasons behind a mountain of illogical babble.

I’m sitting in the back of a United Airlines plane right now with a couple dozen other passengers. We’re crammed like sardines in a few Economy rows, while in front of us are 10 rows of empty “Economy Plus” seats. Either United drastically overestimated the demand for seat upgrades on this flight or they are deliberately trying to shift their seating toward premium spots.

Either way, it seem like a fantastic opportunity to make your customers happy, with a free upgrade to a nicer seat. Simply let people move around before the gate closes, and the plane would be balanced and happy. Better yet, surprise people at check-in with automatic upgrades. People would certainly appreciate and remember such nice treatment and be more likely to choose your airline in the future. They’d also have had a taste of Economy Plus benefits and know what they’re worth the next time.

Unfortunately, the policies in place prohibit that. I’ve heard reasons from the flight attendant ranging from “it would imbalance the plane” (what kind of bizarre balance do we have now?) to “it wouldn’t be fair to the people who paid for these seats” (would they fail to have them?) and “only gate agents can change seats” (Southwest passengers choose their own seats on every flight), but in the end the the result is that no one on board is authorized to change anyone’s seat, and we took off with an embarrassment of open seats in front of an angry crowd. There’s even only one person in the entire exit row (which the gate attendant denied existing when I tried to check for available seats), and I’m not really sure who would be in charge of opening the other door in case of emergency.

In the meantime, since they boarded the flight early and we sat for a while (including a delay while one man tried to pay for an upgrade, requiring assistance from both flight attendants), the entire back of the plane has been buzzing about the ridiculous situation and pestering the flight attendant, who clearly has no power to do anything but is scrambling to placate the mob by reciting all the reasons she can’t. Everyone is participating in a shared cathartic conversation about the ineptitudes of United Airlines. Except for me, as I’m busy writing this screed to post online (I may not be as persuasive as [the United breaks guitars guy](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YGc4zOqozo&feature=youtube_gdata), but I do what I can). I wouldn’t be surprised if United loses dozens of customers over this single mismanaged flight.

My last United trip (note: my spell correction software just suggested “untenable” instead of “United” when I mistyped; I was tempted to keep it that way) was similarly outrageous. When checking in for the flight we were told for the first time that our seats were not guaranteed and we’d have to stand by the desk, watching a screen to see if we got on. That time I gave in to the extortion and upgraded to Economy Plus (which guaranteed seats), while watching dozens of people get bumped from the flight and delay their vacations, and I vowed to never fly the airline again as long as that behavior continued. United seems to have abandoned that policy, only to replace it with one just as ridiculous when I gave them a second chance.

I don’t mind if an airline–or any company–charges higher prices if that’s backed up by consistent, humane behavior. And I recognize that airlines are feeling pressure on their bottom lines and operate in an extremely regulated, bureaucratic industry. But this pattern of bait-and-switch penny pinching has spoiled United for me, and in the future I’ll pay premiums and inconvenience myself to fly other airlines, avoiding United whenever I can.

What lessons can be found here? First, be real with your policies. Give them wiggle room and empower your people to modify them on the fly. The saddest part of the whole situation to me was watching the poor flight attendant harrangued by the passengers when she had no authority to help. I love a tip from [Tim Ferris](http://fourhourworkweek.com), who authorizes his assistants to solve any customer’s problem, without consulting him, if it costs less than $100 to fix. Over time, he’s repeatedly *raised* that limit rather than lowering it.

Second, be transparent in your customer interactions. Don’t mix prices around hoping to squeeze a bit more money out of people. Just state clearly what you offer for what price.

Finally, when you have the chance to do something nice for people, especially when it doesn’t cost you anything, do it! Actively look for ways to be generous to your customers. They’ll remember it and be loyal to you for a long time.

UPDATE: The next flight was “oversold by 40”, which resulted in lots of frayed nerves and strict enforcement of carry-on restrictions, which slowed boarding to a crawl and irritated nearly everyone.

So rule 4 from this trip: Don’t promise what you can’t deliver.

Get a life Bob

Was it the Wendell Berry quote?

Image by Matt Davies

Colin Powell’s Leadership lessons

[These lessons from Colin Powell](http://www.chally.com/enews/powell.html) are much more interesting than the usual CEO tripe…

* Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off.
* The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They have either lost confidence that you can help them or concluded that you do not care. Either case is a failure of leadership.
* Don’t be buffaloed by experts and elites. Experts often possess more data than judgment. Elites can become so inbred that they produce hemophiliacs who bleed to death as soon as they are nicked by the real world.
* Don’t be afraid to challenge the pros, even in their own backyard.
* Never neglect details. When everyone’s mind is dulled or distracted the leader must be doubly vigilant.
* You don’t know what you can get away with until you try.
* Keep looking below surface appearances. Don’t shrink from doing so (just) because you might not like what you find.
* Endeavors succeed or fail because of the people involved. Only by attracting the best people will you accomplish great deeds.
* Organization charts and fancy titles count for next to nothing.
* Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position goes, your ego goes with it.
* Fit no stereotypes. Don’t chase the latest management fads. The situation dictates which approach best accomplishes the team’s mission.
* Perpetual optimism is a force multiplier.
* Powell’s Rules for Picking People: Look for intelligence and judgment and, most critically, a capacity to anticipate, to see around corners. Also look for loyalty, integrity, a high energy drive, a balanced ego and the drive to get things done.
* (Borrowed by Powell from Michael Korda): Great leaders are almost always great simplifiers, who can cut through argument, debate and doubt, to offer a solution everybody can understand.
* Use the formula P=40 to 70, in which P stands for the probability of success and the numbers indicate the percentage of information acquired. Once the information is in the 40 to 70 range, go with your gut.
* The commander in the field is always right and the rear echelon is wrong, unless proved otherwise.
* Have fun in your command.
* Command is lonely.

When not to charge more

“I should charge 600 euros [for a meal at elBulli],” Adrià has said, “but I do not cook for millionaires. I cook for sensitive people.” – HBS Cases: Customer Feedback Not on elBullis Menu.