{"id":2050,"date":"2003-02-17T15:07:16","date_gmt":"2003-02-17T15:07:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/?p=2050"},"modified":"2003-02-17T15:07:16","modified_gmt":"2003-02-17T15:07:16","slug":"the-death-of-design","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/the-death-of-design\/","title":{"rendered":"The Death of Design"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>as a designer, i am often asked to create things that &#8220;look good&#8221; or &#8220;work well&#8221; or are &#8220;pleasing&#8221;. the trouble with this is that nothing is ever &#8220;pleasing&#8221; to everyone. in fact, the increasing amount of <a href=http:\/\/dsonline.computer.org\/0301\/d\/w1lind.htm>personalization in society today<\/a> means that users expect everything they encounter to be tailored to them specifically, to the point that <a href=http:\/\/www.consumerwebwatch.org\/news\/report3_credibilityresearch\/stanfordPTL_abstract.htm>studies of websites show<\/a> that users will leave immediately if the design of the site is not visually appealing to them.<\/p>\n<p>so what can be done? in <a href=http:\/\/design.stanford.edu\/PD\/>conventional product design<\/a>, the answer is to <a href=http:\/\/www.jumpassociates.com>study the users<\/a> extensively, and tailor the final product to the scientifically-determined &#8220;average user&#8221;. but come on now, that&#8217;s no fun. a better way might be best exemplified by the <a href=http:\/\/www.xml.com>internet markup language XML<\/a>. today, XML means lots of different things to lots of different people, but what it means to everyone is that every piece of information on a page has <a href=http:\/\/www.w3.org\/Metadata\/>&#8220;metadata&#8221;<\/a> attached to it, telling the reader what type of information it is. example tags are &#8220;link&#8221;, &#8220;creator&#8221;, &#8220;description&#8221;, &#8220;subject&#8221;, and &#8220;date&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>what this gives users the power to do is to format the information in whatever way they wish. for instance, i use a program called <a href=http:\/\/ranchero.com\/netnewswire\/>&#8220;NetNewsWire&#8221;<\/a>, from <a href=http:\/\/ranchero.com\/>Ranchero Software<\/a>, to collect <a href=http:\/\/www.webreference.com\/perl\/tutorial\/8\/>RSS feeds<\/a> from around the internet (like <a href=..\/index.rdf>the one published with my weblog<\/a>). there are two great benefits of collecting information this way: 1) i can browse tons of information from one place, much more quickly than i could by visiting individual webpages; 2) it allows me to put the information in my own format (or in this case, the format of NetNewsWire). same content, but in my preferred format.<\/p>\n<p>not quite sure what this will mean for the future of web browsing. <a href=http:\/\/www.kottke.org>kottke.org already has <a href=http:\/\/www.kottke.org\/03\/01\/030108why_are_safa.html>mockups of the integration<\/a> of a web browser (<a href=http:\/\/www.apple.com>apple<\/a>&#8216;s <a href=http:\/\/www.apple.com\/safari>safari<\/a>) and an agent (like NetNewsWire and apple&#8217;s <a href=http:\/\/www.apple.com\/sherlock>sherlock<\/a>). the pendulum of web design is swinging back toward the functional again after a brief dalliance in flash and heavy graphics, and with that swing may come a revolution in the way the internet is used. excited? me too.<\/p>\n<p>Now Playing: <B>Wasted &#038; Ready<\/B> by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22Ben Kweller%22\" target=\"_blank\">Ben Kweller<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>as a designer, i am often asked to create things that &#8220;look good&#8221; or &#8220;work well&#8221; or are &#8220;pleasing&#8221;. the trouble with this is that nothing is ever &#8220;pleasing&#8221; to everyone. in fact, the increasing amount of personalization in society today means that users expect everything they encounter to be tailored to them specifically, to&#8230;<a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/the-death-of-design\/\">more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[65,66,67],"class_list":["post-2050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-design","tag-design-2","tag-personalization","tag-style-function"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9wjHJ-x4","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}