{"id":2082,"date":"2003-11-12T11:43:19","date_gmt":"2003-11-12T11:43:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/?p=2082"},"modified":"2003-11-12T11:43:19","modified_gmt":"2003-11-12T11:43:19","slug":"sync","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/sync\/","title":{"rendered":"Sync"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A book by Steven Strogatz, professor of applied mathematics at Cornell University.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nNotes<\/p>\n<p>21 Similarities to Nonzero&#8217;s &#8220;Tit for Tat&#8221;; &#8220;Each one was responding robotically to the impulses fired by others, with no goal in mind (firefly blinking simulation)<\/p>\n<p>27 Sync is mathematically inevitable&#8211;&#8220;if you choose a (starting) point at random, you have no chance of picking a bad one&#8221;; i.e. one that doesn&#8217;t lead to sync. Bad points exist, but it&#8217;s like pinning down a line that exists between 2 points but has no thickness.<\/p>\n<p>35 Fireflies do nonzero&#8211;by blinking together they can attract females from far away who would never see just one blinking.<\/p>\n<p>37 Women sync reproductive cycles to aid their offspring by having a community with lots of babies at once and thus adequate resources.<\/p>\n<p>42 The brain&#8217;s internal clock is synchronized by a number of &#8220;sloppy&#8221; ones; lowest common denominator? NO&#8211;because once the median particles notice they&#8217;re close, they decide to become absolutely synched and thus have more pull to get the outliers synched with them (p. 52 &#8220;Once a few oscillators happened to sync by chance, their combined, coherent shouting stood out above the background din, and exerted a stronger effect on all the others.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>55 To prove sync, each successive scientist seems to narrow the scope of what they test, in order to prove it absolutely&#8211;but for a tiny percentage of events at the end, seemingly&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>56 Sync could be called &#8220;the science of peer pressure&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>62 Interestingly these &#8220;ultimate truths&#8221; of sync are still very invested in science and mathematics; Einstein&#8217;s &#8220;make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler&#8221; comes to mind.<\/p>\n<p>66 Testing these hypotheses outside the computer is difficult because measuring such small items disturbs the network; the Heisenberg Principle for living things.<\/p>\n<p>69 Weiner, Galileo, Mendel, etc. are &#8220;prophets, with a vision of how the world should work&#8221;; see Huxley quote below; it&#8217;s a different way of science, knowing what you want to find and then setting up your experiments to test for it; but it occassionally works, as for these men.<\/p>\n<p>96 Missing your bedtime\/normal falling-asleep time causes your body to try to wait for another major change in body temperature, which is &#8220;entrained&#8221; to rise and fall at certain hours.<\/p>\n<p>97 Working the night shift causes lots of problems, sleep disorders, operating in the &#8220;zombie zone&#8221;, disrupted family and social ties.<\/p>\n<p>98 Sunlight the most important sync stimulator.<\/p>\n<p>109 Lasers are synched light waves emitted from atoms.<\/p>\n<p>113 American power grid relies on sync; reminded of Barabasi&#8217;s column in the NYTimes about the blackouts in NYC, August 2003; http:\/\/www.ryskamp.org\/brain\/networks\/power_outages_and_networks.html<\/p>\n<p>115 When power plants experimented with frequencies of AC, one group tried 25 cycles\/second, which caused light bulbs to flicker noticably &#8211; seems like it would be like living in a movie (24 fps!); today&#8217;s North America standard is 60\/sec, the rest of the world is 50\/sec<\/p>\n<p>125 One hypothesis for the oceans&#8217; creation is a &#8220;wayward planetary embryo&#8221; spun out of Jupiter&#8217;s orbit (which had water) that hit Earth (which didn&#8217;t); traditional explanation is comets but our water is chemically quite different from theirs.<\/p>\n<p>126 &#8220;Every electron in the universe is indistinguishable from every other. They never age. They never break or chip. And their perfection makes them capable of group behavior beyond anything we&#8217;ve ever experienced.&#8221; Small sync is even more impressive than big (planetary, etc) sync.<\/p>\n<p>131 Fermions make things different; they cannot occupy the same space with each other (electrons in neat orbital shells); this leads to differences between elements, rules for chemical bonding, magnetism. Bosons do the opposite, they &#8220;are inveterate joiners, conformists. They love to sing along.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>134 Absolute zero seems like the speed of light; you can&#8217;t get there by conventional means; but you can get very very close.<\/p>\n<p>135 The idea that electrons can form pairs took 50 years to develop and was stated matter-of-factly in my high school chemistry class&#8211;the evolution of knowledge builds upon itself at the cost of absolute derivation of all things for any one person.<\/p>\n<p>138 The value of imperfection in a system; it allows for &#8220;grooves&#8221; to form, instigated by one leader and many others &#8220;drafting&#8221; him. If the system was ideal, all would go their own ways.<\/p>\n<p>139 Boys with toys; is it need or competitive desire? Could war just be a way that grown men play? Increasing complexity is necessary for happiness (Flow) and the same old games are boring after a while.<\/p>\n<p>142 True, prompted synchrony creates things not seen in nature; a fluid that behaved nothing like water, a quantum fluid.<\/p>\n<p>158 The true challenge of sync is to predict the group behavior, given what is known about the individuals.<\/p>\n<p>161 Our memory for odors is based on pattern-matching, where our brain&#8217;s neurons for smell oscillate at different frequencies to elicit different experiences of smell.<\/p>\n<p>163 Strogatz impressed by his student writing in calligraphy&#8230;I need to improve my handwriting, though difficult on the train.<\/p>\n<p>164  A torus is the physical shape of a cyclic event; valuable for visualizing events (E@S, etc?).<\/p>\n<p>167 Strogatz settled on a multipanel screen setup to visualize difficult concepts; &#8220;I needed some way to expand my mind, to try to grasp what was going on in this nine-dimensional wilderness.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>171 Human society unlikely to sync because of Strogatz&#8217;s four criteria: Vast numbers of individual oscillators (yes); weakly coupled to ensure individuality (no); each coupled to all others the exact same (no); each nearly identical (probably yes).<\/p>\n<p>184 Sync can be persistent without being periodic; so chaos can be synchronized as long as we all proceed in sync through it.<\/p>\n<p>189 Life ruled by chaos is impossible to live; &#8220;Every moment would be a moment of truth. Every decision would have long-term consequences that would alter your life beyond recognition&#8230;to retain a measure of sanity one has to believe that nearly all such decisions are inconsequential.&#8221; Sliding Doors movie explored this.<\/p>\n<p>190 Beyond the Lyapunov time scale (below) it is impossible to predict anything for a system. For the solar system, that limit is 4 billion years, at the dawn of the Earth. So anything could have happened then and we cannot prove it.<\/p>\n<p>200 Francis Ford Coppola&#8217;s movie &#8220;The Conversation&#8221;; a couple uses synchronization in a chaotic environment to provide them with privacy; whispering closely in a loud area so no others can eavesdrop.<\/p>\n<p>216 Spirals the closest Strogatz came to universal truth; they are present in all rhythmic &#8220;excitable media&#8221;, physical, chemical, and biological.<\/p>\n<p>230 We care about networks because we live in a networked world and are scared by things &#8220;whose reach is immense, whose structure we can only dimly perceive, and whose functioning bewilders us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>231 Genome as a &#8220;blueprint&#8221; is outdated; things do not follow directly from it. It is more like a &#8220;computer&#8221;, which reacts dynamically to different situations in a predefined way.<\/p>\n<p>231 Strogatz argues that it&#8217;s the pattern, the structure, of the system; not the individuals. Gladwell would disagree, but Flow agrees, so does Cannon.<\/p>\n<p>240 Because we are real people and not some idealized pattern, our friendship circles overlap, introducing randomness to the system. (the problem with the system on page 171).<\/p>\n<p>241 &#8220;The slightest bit of randomness contracted the network tremendously&#8221;&#8211;with just 1% random connections the average length between 2 random items dropped 85%; the ISIS Blender can unite almost all campus with just a few people in it; Gladwell&#8217;s &#8220;Connectors&#8221;, though picked by the structure and not personality type. Perhaps both Gladwell and Strogatz can be right: it IS connectors doing the work; but the connectors are created by the system.<\/p>\n<p>244 &#8220;C. elegans&#8221; is the organism first chosen to test on because &#8220;it is perhaps the simplest organism that shares many of the biological processes essential to human life.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>250 References Adam Smith&#8217;s &#8220;Invisible Hand&#8221;; no one knows they are part of a system but by working only for self-interest (Flow&#8217;s &#8220;autotelic&#8221; actions), the system self-organizes for greater good.<\/p>\n<p>266 Many similarities to &#8220;Tipping Point&#8221;: Early adopter (&#8220;Maven&#8221;) is first to act; if they have the right friends (&#8220;Connectors&#8221;) the item spreads. Strogatz sees 2 tipping points: one when the groups in the small world coalesce and sync; one when enough of an individual&#8217;s neighbors have synched to make it worthwhile for them to sync as well&#8211;makes the well-connected resistant to syncing (b\/c for the required percentage of their friends to sync, it must be a very high number of people).<\/p>\n<p>267 A &#8220;problem&#8221; with this (Duncan Watt&#8217;s analogy) is that it is idealized; people&#8217;s connections are not always similar. But that should just increase the network effect, if a few people hold much of the influence&#8230;things will spread faster.<\/p>\n<p>273 Sync is resistable; but only if you WANT to resist! Communist people had no desire to clap faster than the minimum synchrony and thus become wild applause, which is chaotic.<\/p>\n<p>284 Strogatz ends where Hawkins and Doerksen begin: &#8220;What is the physical foundation of consciousness?&#8221; Could it be synchrony of neurons?<\/p>\n<p>286 Complexity theory taught that simple units interacting could generate unexpected order; but sync is necessary to find out where this order comes from.<\/p>\n<p>Quotes<\/p>\n<p>1 &#8220;The laws of thermodynamics seem to dictate the opposite&#8230;yet all around us we see magnificent structures&#8230;that have somehow managed to assemble themselves.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>69 &#8220;The great tragedy of science is the slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact.&#8221; &#8211; T.H. Huxley, English biologist<\/p>\n<p>97 &#8220;Shift work poses major problems for all industrialized societies, problems that will only grow worse. Economics is pushing us to a 24-hour society, with factories and businesses and financial markets operating round the clock.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>104 &#8220;Serendipitous discoveries are always made by people in a particular frame of mind, people who are focused and alert because they&#8217;re searching for something. They just happen to find something else.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>110 &#8220;Imagine you wake up one morning and find yourself on an alien planet, entirely deserted except for a watermelon with a step stool beside it.&#8221; &#8211; strangest analogy I&#8217;ve ever heard!<\/p>\n<p>127 &#8220;When I was six years old, my parents gave me a big battery to play with&#8230;&#8221; Explain anything?<\/p>\n<p>154 &#8220;It is a wonderful feeling to recognize the unity of a complex of phenomena that to direct observation appear to be quite separate things.&#8221; Einstein<\/p>\n<p>170 &#8220;You should never trust a fact until it&#8217;s been confirmed by theory.&#8221; old adage<\/p>\n<p>273 &#8220;In individuals, insanity is rare, but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule&#8221; &#8211; Nietzsche<\/p>\n<p>273 &#8220;He who joyfully marches to music rank and file, has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.&#8221; &#8211; Einstein<\/p>\n<p>Definitions<\/p>\n<p>3 Coupled oscillators &#8211; entities that cycle automatically, that repeat themselves over and over again at more or less regular time intervals.<\/p>\n<p>42 Electroencephalographers &#8211; Scientists who measure brain waves looking for characteristic patterns (like Asimov&#8217;s Second Foundation.<\/p>\n<p>72 Entrainment &#8211; the external synchronization created by falling in step with the outside world<\/p>\n<p>112 Laser &#8211; Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation; &#8220;every time a photon hits an excited atom it duplicates itself, amplifying the amount of light traveling in that direction.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>129 Fiat &#8211; a decree, an order; &#8220;Niels Bohr solved the puzzle of nose-diving electrons by sheer fiat. He declared that electrons were &#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>159 Self-organized criticality &#8211; &#8220;Why so many complex systems seem perpetually poised at the brink of catastrophe.&#8221; Self correction is critical, like in the Matrix with the &#8220;One&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>164 Torus &#8211; the physical shape of a cyclic event (my defn.).<\/p>\n<p>190 Lyapunov time &#8211; a time scale defined by the inherent dynamics of a system beyond which prediction is impossible for that system.<\/p>\n<p>213 Excitable media &#8211; that which, upon stimulation, um, changes&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>242 Small-world networks &#8211; those that manage to be both small and highly clustered simultaneously. Usually only big networks have the numbers to &#8220;specialize&#8221; and cluster in groups within them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A book by Steven Strogatz, professor of applied mathematics at Cornell University.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[148],"tags":[202,168,203,79,165,200,201],"class_list":["post-2082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","tag-chaos","tag-game-theory","tag-mathematics","tag-networks","tag-nonzero","tag-steven-strogatz","tag-sync"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/s9wjHJ-sync","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2082\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bob.ryskamp.org\/brain\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}