Films

Notes from What Happened to Kerouac?

About once a year I read my dog-eared copy of _On the Road_, and for a few days dream of road trips, ’50s cars, poetry readings and camping. The lifestyle expressed in Kerouac’s books is so unique yet so consistent, so I was interested in the life of the author, since I didn’t really know “what happened” to Kerouac.

Turns out the man responsible for these documents of hope and exploration was deeply troubled by many things, and his refuge in alcohol finally overcame him. The film [What Happened to Kerouac](http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Jack_Kerouac_What_Happened_to_Kerouac/70026469) enlists many of Jack’s friends to tell his story, and it turns out dark and depressing. Some moments of hope, but certainly not the story of creativity I expected.

### Notes

Kerouac couldn’t speak English until he was 6.

He apparently said that since he was Catholic and not allowed to commit suicide, he would drink himself to death…which he did.

Kerouac came up with the title “Naked Lunch” for Burroughs.

“How would you define the word ‘Beat'” “Sympathetic.” – 15:00, asked by Steve Allen

“He said, ‘I am a spy in somebody else’s body'” – Burroughs

Carolyn Cassady guessed that Jack envied Neal’s self-assurance and macho nature; Neal envied Jack’s education and middle-class security.

Kerouac had very little in his room at home, living “like a monk”, but he did have a big crucifix above the typewriter, apparently having great devotion to it. (Father Spike Morrisette)

Kerouac would get himself in good shape before a crazy writing spree–sleeping a lot, exercising, eating well–then completely devoting himself to the work, without sleeping or eating much.

“He had little brown-paper manila-covered notebooks, in which he would write in pencil a lot…his theory was that you should have a notebook and pencil at all times.” – Gary Snyder, 58:00

Best parts are the times Kerouac reads his own work. Really a great performer.

Notes from The Mystery of Picasso

[This remarkable film](http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_Mystery_of_Picasso/60025585) shows the process of Picasso creating 20 different paintings, using a camera mounted behind the translucent canvas. You see his process of trying things out and discarding them, prototyping the work directly on the canvas. I’ve never seen anything quite like it, and wanted to view this since viewing a short clip online.

It starts out a bit slow, with lots of real-time marker sketches. Still, his comfort with “just drawing”, and letting things evolve is clear and remarkable. Gradually the film speeds up, with more artistic selections of frames to summarize the process.

Around 50 minutes, he starts painting which was much more interesting. The final painting had me gasping out loud as he repeatedly changed his painting in progressively greater ways.

He continually adds detail to pieces, and then often blacks out over sections of detail he added. His detailing jumps all over the page; he builds the entire piece at once rather than sections at a time.

The story is that the paintings were all destroyed after filming–however, one of the commentators notes that this was not the case; several are known to exist still, one in the Musee Picasso in Paris.

### Notes from the film

~23:00 he starts using abstract lines and shapes and then turning them into people. It’s hard to imagine he was planning this from the start, but it’s possible. That initial grid structure, however, helps define major body shapes and also connects one body to another with shared lines.

“So, what do we do now?” “Let’s do another one. Unless you’re tired.” “I don’t mind being tired.” – 29:00

At 30:00, a remarkable 5 minute real-time scene where he paints an intricate detailed chicken and then uses that only as the shape of a human head in the end.

Unlike the 22:00 ones, other paintings he begins with much more realistic scenes and turns them into cubist pieces later. His inks tend to simplify the piece, overriding lines and blocking the piece off.

He takes less care with his sketches than I could have imagined; seemingly confident he can fix them up later in the process. Even shapes of heads, etc, are by no means realistic.

At 50:00, interesting exchange about “going deeper”…followed by much more interesting paintings using oils to “show the layers”. Five hours to do that though. (54:00) Interesting that he didn’t know how long it had been.

Collage + paint at 54:00

Realistic sketch -> cubist at 55:45. Erases the sketch to draw over it differently.

At 1:00:00, he begins the painting I saw on Google video, painting a very realistic bull and matador, then at 1:02:30 totally warping the bull into a cubist shape.

Final painting (at 1:04:30) is a real trip…he paints over the same scene dozens of times, finally becoming unsatisfied with it, using paper cutouts (again layered) to prototype different approaches, then painting over once more before deciding to start over, now that he knew what he was painting.

“I’ve never worried about the audience, and I’m not about to start now, at my age” – 1:11:45

“Now that I know where I’m going, I’ll get a new canvas and start over” – :1:13:00. And on that second one, he quickly paints exactly what he wanted. The first was apparently just for experimentation, literally throwing away the first draft.

One commentator thinks that this could be partially showmanship by Picasso, who was “very aware of his own stature in the art world”, but regardless it shows a remarkable ability to discard the past and move forward.

Notes from Comedian

This movie is about Jerry Seinfeld starting over. He threw away all his bits and went back to begging clubs for a short set, floundering on stage, trying to figure out how it all works.

This is how comedians develop material. And as you can see it’s quite painful. – 6:00

That’s painful, watching yourself on tape. Even if you’re doing well, you’re like, ‘Damn, look at the way my hand moved.’ – Orny Adams, 9:30

When you’re growing up, everybody is funny. And then at some point, everybody went off and got jobs. – 14:30

It does not matter what the audience is…get up every night, anywhere you can…when you’re crafting an act, you need to see how that material works in front of each type of situation. – quoting Colin Quinn, 17:00

20 minutes in 3 months is a TON…[but] 20 minutes is not comedy. An hour, an hour-fifteen minutes is comedy. You learn how to open, how to sustain, to pace. – 19:00

That’s why I’m doing this, I’m scared that I’m not going to be able to do it anymore if I don’t keep doing it, and it might leave me. – 19:45

If [construction workers] can exhibit that level of dedication for that job, I should be able to do the same. – 48:30

This is the greatest comedy show in the last 10 years…you know, since that Sinbad show in the Caribbean. – 59:00

I guess it’s just my nature, it’s just never good enough. – 1:12:00

Get into something dumb–deep into it–you’ll find the greatest wisdom. – 0:30 of Porsche clip

I find nothing more arrogant than people talking about where ideas come from, as if they know, and as if they had something to do with it. I was absolutely nothing but a conduit for that line. I don’t know where it came from; I just wrote it down. And I never liked it. Never supported it, never believed in it. And it has shown itself to me to be worthy, and I have begrudgingly had to admit it. And there it is, it’s in my act. And there are other things, like DNA, which I’ve loved, and nurtured, and fed with an eyedropper, and massaged its little wings, and every time I push it out of the nest it falls right on its head. – 1:15 of DNA clip

Notes from Chuck Jones – Extremes and Inbetweens

A fun portrait ([Netflix](http://www.netflix.com/Movie/Chuck_Jones_Extremes_and_in_Betweens_a_Life_in_Animation/60024809) ) of the famed Warner Bros. director Chuck Jones, creator of Road Runner & Coyote, Pepe le Peu, and more.

“Smear drawings” – using “smeared” frames to transition from one view to another view; a form of “limited animation”, e.g. not drawing every single frame realistically – 14:45

Don’t give up:

> I got fired a number of times, but they didn’t seem to take…I didn’t know I was fired, so I just stuck around. – 15:30

Bugs Bunny as “the anti-Mickey Mouse” – Leonard Maltin, 17:50

Daffy as Bugs’ foil:

> If Bugs were there, he’d be triumphant; but if Daffy’s there, you know he’s going to screw it up. – 21:00

Pick a cliche and work _within_ it to help you focus on character:

> The genre parodies give you a big leg up. You can just focus on the content–the form is all set…because the audience knows the reference points, he can move much faster and just concentrate on what he does best, which is being funny. – Lorne Michaels, 26:00

Music (usually classical) often provided the constraints for him to design something great. Jones is famous for using famous classical and opera pieces in cartoons.

> If you’re dealing with a hunk of music–notes–you have to be honest with yourself, and them. And the more you narrow it, the better it gets. – 59:30

Ah, the true goal of animation:

> I don’t want something that’s realistic–I want something that’s believable – 1:09:40

Read More »

Notes from The Making of The Incredibles

I love “making of” documentaries about great filmmakers. Every time I watch one of these, I’m blown away by how much work it is to make a movie–it’s all the business of making products, plus all the creativity of making art.

On a recommendation, I picked up the “bonus materials” disc for _The Incredibles_, written and directed by Brad Bird. It exemplifies all these traits and more.

### Notes

Pixar asked Brad Bird to come in because “they were worried about getting complacent” (3:00)

Lou Romano == Ray Romano’s brother???

Piano “mockups” for the soundtrack (8:30)

“Animation is capturing the essence of it and putting your own spin on it. We’re doing a movie that could absolutely be done in live action in terms of telling the story. But it couldn’t tell it *this way*…to a degree that it would look silly in live-action.” – Brad Bird (11:00)

Pixar has an acting room where animators film themselves on videotape to test movements; mirrors on the walls so you can see from all angles (14:45)

“If you are willing to lose this one thing that originally…everyone loved…then all these other things…click together, then that’s what you have to do.” – Brad Bird (25:45)

They animate sketches to test the story (bonus 5:00)

“The reason to do animation is caricature” – Brad Bird (bonus 6:45)

Incredibles cubicle sequence (from the final film) good for explaining office space redesign?

The setting of the film: “the future, as seen from the mid-60s” – Brad Bird bonus 32:30

“Squetching – a combination of sqeezing and stretching” – bonus 40:00

“So here i am in the morning, I’m writing about the Republican convention of 1880, and then in the afternoon, I get to say things like “The robot lost its claw!” That is just something you *never* get to say when you’re talking about the Garfield administration.” – Sarah Vowell, who was writing a book about presidential assassinations while performing the voice of Violet.

“In radio, we paint a picture out of sound. It uses a lot of imagination, instead of this film crap.” – Sarah Vowell

“All I know is the first pain reliever you reach for is the dream sequence, because basically you’re looking for a way to say certain things, and the easiest way is to say them in an abstract way that you don’t have to work into your reality…I’m learning that they are an early solution that you use…to get an idea in a film that you don’t have a better way of doing.” – Brad Bird 33:30 bonus

Notes from Sketches of Frank Gehry

Notes from Sketches of Frank Gehry:

His first house in LA became his experimental playground, and eventually changed the course of his career.

I loved the idea of leaving the house intact and not messing with it. I came up with the idea of building the new house around it. – 9:30

Let me tell how he finished his house. One day he went up to shave in the bathroom, and there was no light to shave by. And so he picked up a hammer and knocked a hole into the ceiling, into the California sun. And then he shaved by it. – 10:30 (Charles Jencks, friend)

At the same time as I did [my] house, I was building Santa Monica Place. The night Santa Monica Place opened, we had a dinner here with the president of the Rouse company [who had paid for the development]…and he said, “What the hell is this!” I said, well, I was experimenting and playing with it. And he said, do you like it? You must like it! And I said, I do. He said, well, if you like this, then you can’t possibly like that–and he pointed over there, toward Santa Monica Place. And I said, you’re right, I don’t. And he said, so why’d you do that? I said, because I had to make a living. And he said, stop it. Stop it, don’t do that. And I said, you’re right. Now at that moment, 45 people in my office were working on projects for him. And he and I shook hands that night and decided to quit everything. And it was like jumping off a cliff, it was an amazing feeling, and I was so happy from then on. And even with all the stress of it, it just made me very happy. – 11:00

There is a huge amount of discussion about how the light hits a building, both from Gehry and Philip Johnson, throughout the film.

On his prototypes (always a combination of physical models and drawing):

I always work on two or three scales at once. Keeps me real. In my head, it keeps me thinking of the real building. I don’t become enamored with [the models]. Otherwise it could become jewelry, the object of desire, which I don’t want it to be. – 19:00

And his admiration of painters:

If I have a big envy in my life, it’s about painters. I wish I was a painter. What I’m fascinated with is the moment of truth. There’s the canvas, it’s on your easel, you’ve got a brush, and you’ve got this goddamn palette of colors and what do you do. what’s that first move. I love that dangerous place. [Interviewer: Have you ever tried to paint?] Never. I wouldn’t dare. because I wouldn’t know what to do. I know how to do a building. – 1:08:00

Notes from The World According to Sesame Street

[The World According to Sesame Street](http://www.netflix.com/Movie/The_World_According_to_Sesame_Street/70044984) is an interesting movie about creating localized Sesame Street versions in other countries. It also serves as an inspirational story about the power of communication to change and start positive memes, and thereby improve the world of the children who experience it.

> Our mission at Sesame Workshop is to use media to help children reach their highest potential. (2:00)

Each localized show is a combination of unique local stories, lessons and puppetry, and translated clips from other countries to fill it out. The emphasis is on the local content, however.

> Internationalism doesn’t mean you copy the rich country. Internationalism means that you can now offer your country’s best thing to the rest of the world. (9:21)

“They say if you watch television it’s a sin and it also hurts your eyes. [Asked if he watches TV] Yes.” – Bangladeshi boy (13:30)

In Kosovo, a team member saw teaching childen to recognize hand grenades as a major opportunity for the show. (31:30) However no one on the team (both Serbs and Albanians, bitter enemies for decades) had ideas for a segment on empathy. (32:00)

Muppets come in a few different flavors: animals (usually native), “monsters” (ambiguous creatures), and humanoids (usually with non-natural skin tones–purple, green–to avoid racism). This last bit also makes many scenes easy to port to another culture and simply dub to their language.

> We thought the muppets were quintessentially American, and it turns out they’re the most international creatures ever created. (19:15)

The biggest opportunity in Bangladesh came through influencing a Minister in the government; nothing else had worked. Interesting (unfortunate?) that many (most?) places in the world are not meritocracies. Reminds me of this quote from [The Management Myth](http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200606/stewart-business):

> I once sat through a presentation in which a consultant, a Harvard M.B.A., showed…how the client company’s “competitive advantage” could be analyzed in terms of “the five forces”…”No,” [the client] said, shaking his head with feigned chagrin. “There are only three forces in this case. And two of them are in the Finance Ministry.”

Notes from War Photographer

_War Photographer_ ([Netflix](http://www.netflix.com/Movie/War_Photographer/60032414), [Amazon](http://www.amazon.com/War-Photographer-James-Nachtwey/dp/B0000C825I/bobdesigns-20/)) is the story of [James Nachtwey](http://www.google.com/search?q=james+nachtwey), a [photographer](http://www.jamesnachtwey.com/) of wars, famine, and poverty for over 20 years who [recently received the 2007 TED Prize](http://www.ted.com/index.php/pages/view/id/101) ([acceptance speech](http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/84)).

Despite his life in extreme situations and places, Nachtwey reminds me in many ways of Mr. Rogers, one of my heroes. His personality and even his appearance evoke the comparison. The greatest similarity, though, is both men’s motivation to change the world through the media, and their compassion for the people they feature. As his best friend says late in the film, “I think he thinks that good will triumph eventually over evil…I think that keeps him straight in his own head about what he’s doing. I think his optimism keeps him from being cynical, finally.” (1:19:40)

Not every war photographer seems to have the same motivation. Des Wright, from Reuters, said “I’ve got no idea why we’re doing this” (55:50). Nachtway’s decision to become a war photographer was made when he saw the photographs coming back from Vietnam, and how they showed things in conflict with what the politicians were saying.

He doesn’t speak onscreen at any point during the first 27 minutes; he provides voiceover narration once. He does greet people when he first sees them; after that it’s strictly into photo mode. But his silence isn’t out of shyness or an attempt to distance himself from the situation. Rather, he just seems very thoughtful, and reticent to speak out of respect for the voices of the people he photographs. Sometimes he even steps in, trying to help and protect the people. Wright tells a story about how Jim was on his hands and knees begging a mob not to kill a man in Palestine. (59:00)

There’s a story told by a German publisher about being in Rwandan refugee camps and seeing the cholera epidemic, and how while everyone else was traumatized by the horrors they’d seen, Nachtwey was calm, organized, and able to sleep. At first blush this seems to paint him as callous and uncaring, but I realized that when you are overcome with emotion and trauma, you’re unable to act. You need to be calm and rational in order to do something about it. And indeed, Jim has been able to photograph and share these scenes of struggle for 20 years, which most people can handle only for short and infrequent visits.

Interestingly, for a film titled _War Photographer_, many of the people featured are not actively engaged in fighting, but suffering from poverty. Nachtwey mentions that often the poverty (especially famines) is a result of war, but I saw his blending of the issues as a reflection of [Naqoyqatsi](http://www.naqoy.com/naqoy/), or “life as war.” The gap between the rich and the poor, for instance, is also a war, and a difficult one that doesn’t have a clear measure of peace or an easily-identified face.

In that vein, watching the lives of the Indonesian people living between the railroad tracks (~38:00), and working in the sulfur mines, made me even more convinced that the current way we work is limited. We need to find new ways of working, that scale better, that are less dependent on physical ability and attractiveness, that are fairer internationally, and that value people’s true worth. As we’ve seen time and time again, people in developing countries just want to work. They just want to have the same opportunities to work a long, hard week like we do. Helping them do so is a form of making peace as well.

### Interesting quotes from the film

A quote early on, paraphrased: “After the fall of the Berlin Wall, wars stopped being country against country, and started being people against people.”

> It was like theatre, only…I was on the stage, and the script was being written minute by minute. (19:00)

> In a war, the normal codes of civilized behavior are suspended…It would be unthinkable in so called normal life to go into someone’s home where the family is grieving over the death of a loved one and spend long moments photographing them. It simply wouldn’t be done. Those pictures could not have been made unless I was accepted by the people I’m photographing…they wanted me to be there. They understand that a stranger who’s come there with a camera to show the rest of the world what is happening to them gives them a voice in the outside world that they otherwise wouldn’t have. They realize that they are the victims of some kind of injustice…by allowing me there to photograph it, they’re making their own appeal to the outside world and to everyone’s sense of right and wrong. (28:00)

> The most incomprehensible situation i’ve ever witnessed was Rwanda…I just do not understand how people can do that to each other. (31:30)

> [When the Hutus fled to refugee camps and were dying of cholera] I realized that many of the people we were photographing might have been the very ones who commited the massacres I had witnessed just a few weeks before…and it was like taking the express elevator to hell. (33:00)

> [Talking about people living on the dumps in Jakarta] I find it incredible that people are forced to work this way, in order to make about 85 cents US a day (50:00)

> It’s a very competitive business; the most dramatic images are always the ones that get used. And there are a lot of people in the business who are very brutal in the way that they operate. They’re there to get the worst of the worst of the worst, and they do not help. They say, ‘I’m a journalist, I’m sorry, I’m not part of this.’ But I say, ‘But you are part of it’…it is a sick business, to a certain extent. – Des Wright (55:00)

> Fear is not what’s important; it’s how you deal with it, It would be like asking a marathon runner if they feel pain. It’s not if you feel it; it’s how you manage it. (1:06:50, in between several shots of him suffering from tear gas)

> Most of the pictures people see of famine victims are in feeding centers…we’re not turning our back on them and walking away (1:13:00)

> In the last few years it’s gotten more and more difficult [to get famine and suffering shown in the media], as society becomes more and more obsessed with society and entertainment and fashion. Advertisers are tired of having their products displayed next to images of human tragedy; it somehow detracts from the salability of their products. (1:14:00)

> The main purpose of my work is to appear in the mass media. It’s not so much that I want my pictures to be looked upon as art objects as it is a form of communication (1:14:40)

> I’ve ben talking too much; I’m pretty talked out…when this is over, we should head to the Sierras (1:17:45)

> It’s more difficult to get publications to focus on issues that are more critical, that do not provide people with an escape from reality but attempt to get them deeper into reality; to get them concerned about something much greater than themselves. And I think people are concerned. I think quite often publications don’t give their audience enough credit for that…at the end of the day, I believe people do want to know when a major tragedy happens. (1:22:00)

> Why photograph war? Is it possible to put an end to a form of human behavior which has existed throughout history by means of photography?…that very idea has motivated me. For me the strength of photography lies in its ability to evoke a sense of humanity. if war is an attempt to negate humanity, then photography can be perceived as the opposite of war. And if it’s used well, it can be a powerful ingredient in the antidote to war. (~1:28:00)