Mindfulness

Ask, don’t tell

> The leader of the past knew how to tell, the leader of the future will know how to ask. – Peter Drucker

The illusion of knowledge

> The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge. – [Stephen Hawking](http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2012/07/18/how-big-is-the-entire-universe/)

Inner child

[](http://www.yehudamoon.com/index.php?date=2012-05-14)

Home again

> We shall not cease from exploration

> And the end of all our exploring

> Will be to arrive where we started

> And know the place for the first time.

– [T.S. Eliot](http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/T._S._Eliot)

Empathy and imagination

> Is it possible that, we human beings–who are soft-wired for empathic distress–is it possible we could actually extend our empathy to the entire human race as an extended family, and to our fellow creatures as part of our evolutionary family, and to the biosphere as our common community?

> If it’s possible to imagine that, then we may be able to save our species and save our planet. And…if it’s impossible to even imagine that, I don’t see how we’re going to make it.

– [Jeremy Rifkin on “The Empathic Civilization”](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7AWnfFRc7g)

Use who you are

> As we get more technically driven, the importance of people becomes more than it’s ever been before. You have to utilize who you are in your work. Nobody else can do that: nobody else can pull from your background, from your parents, your upbringing, your whole life experience. – [David Carson](http://www.ted.com/talks/david_carson_on_design.html?source=google_plusone)

Consuming and transforming

“Consumer” is one of those words I’ve never been comfortable with. Along with “user”, it refers to real people as simply receptacles for whatever companies churn out for them. It’s a lazy, impersonal, demeaning, and ultimately unhelpful word.

[Alex Bogusky thinks that as consumption is inevitable, people just need to be *better* consumers](http://fearlessrevolution.com/blog/the-empowered-consumer.html). I agree that’s needed, but still believe our word choice matters and can be improved. [Lots of other people think so too](http://www.google.com/search?q=%22the+word+consumer%22).

The most obvious and simple change is to substitute “people” for these dirty words. That works almost universally, and I use it effectively in my design practice. But today I stumbled upon a use of another word that is more than benign–it’s empowering:

[Transformation](http://www.natlogic.com/resources/publications/new-bottom-line/vol4/12-more-things-change-production-transformation/).

The article itself takes the side of “producers”, acknowledging that nothing is truly produced; it is merely transformed from one (perhaps natural) state to another. Carrying that theme through to the people we design for emphasizes that they too will transform what they receive, putting their stamp on it, doing good or ill with it.

Transformation happens to products, commodities, experiences, and ideas. The word transformation recognizes that people have the opportunity to improve what they receive, but also the responsibility of managing it.

I’m going to try substituting the word “transformer” for “person” in my work–probably just to myself at first–to see if it changes my design decisions.

On knowing

When I was a senior in high school, a teacher asked me to join the [impromtou speaking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impromptu_speaking) team. In this competitive speech event, you received a question from a predefined category–for the category “transportation”, it might be something like “Should seatbelts be mandatory?”–and had just 6 minutes to prepare and deliver a speech on it. I had previously acted in drama events, and even improv comedy, but never spoken seriously without preparation.

The first time I tried it, alone with the teacher, I nearly cried. Standing in front of the room, I stumbled through a few points loosely related to the question, forgot to express an opinion, and trailed off to silence after only a minute or two. Undeterred by my failure, my teacher showed me a few tricks to help connect my thoughts and pace my speech better. After a lot of practice and a few competitions, I began to feel more comfortable and deliver better responses. Eventually I made it to the state finals, alongside competition who had much more experience than me.

The most interesting thing I learned from my impromptou experience was the power of nonsense spoken with conviction. I found that with just 5-10 unique stories or data points on a category (e.g. “transportation”), I could string together a compelling argument for almost any question. It wasn’t important that I believed what I was saying, or even that my arguments were consistent across questions. In fact, I would frequently use a single anecdote or data point multiple times in a single day to argue completely opposite things–and as the judges were different for each question, my shifting opinions were no problem. The important thing was that what you said sounded believable on the first pass, which was influenced as much by how you said it as what you said. My bar for “knowing” something was lowered to pass anything that received superficial approval and sounded confident.

As you might expect, this taught exactly the wrong lessons to a self-centered and overconfident teenage boy, which I’ve spent years painfully unlearning in the real world. As I progressed through university and various jobs, working on increasingly difficult and complex topics, it became clear that [falsely knowing](http://www.ryskamp.org/brain/?p=4584)–and acting as such–was a liability, not an advantage. My polished speaking skills, and the belief in my own ability to spin believable solutions out of thin air, combined to set me up for a bigger fall when I encountered situations I wasn’t actually prepared for. The questions I worked on now demanded real, not postured, solutions, and the critiques I received were not from sympathetic teachers at weekend student events, but from brilliant and exceedingly logical friends, mentors, and colleagues searching relentlessly for the truth.

This problem actually gets worse as you gain experience. It’s natural to believe that your years of experience have given you an instinct for “what works” and what doesn’t; that because you’ve been around for a while you can skip some of that boring background work. But in a rapidly-changing world–and anything worth working on seems to be “rapidly-changing”–the facts themselves are shifting so fast that prior experience can also be a handicap. The more you learned on the last project, the more you need to unlearn on the next. It’s the cognitive equivalent of [the Innovator’s Dilemma](http://www.businessweek.com/chapter/christensen.htm): as soon as you get good at something, it becomes useless and your investment in it becomes a burden.

What’s the alternative to this? For me, the solutions have all involved humility and patience: learning to say “I don’t know”; asking for advice; listening more than I speak. Practicing mindfulness through reflection and meditation, to recognize when things have changed and require new approaches. Recognizing that knowing takes time, _especially_ when you’re experienced, and planning extra time to figure things out.

People often think leadership is about personality; that no one knows the right answer, and that you just need to act like you do. Steve Jobs said early in his career, “Pretend to be completely in control and people will assume that you are.” With his recent [geek-beatification](http://sallanscorner.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/memorial-3.jpg), [people are taking this statement as gospel](http://althouse.blogspot.com/2011/12/pretend-to-be-completely-in-control-and.html), and acting confident despite not knowing a thing. I’ve personally watched an entire generation of product managers and designers turn into wannabe-Pied-Pipers based on this advice.

But that’s exactly the wrong lesson to learn from Steve’s work. Instead, look at what he actually did–[continually disrupt his own past successes](http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2011/10/steve_jobs_solved_the_innovato.html). Apple under Steve Jobs was a place that [repeatedly cancelled](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_products_discontinued_by_Apple_Inc.) [successful products](https://discussions.apple.com/thread/188174?start=0&tstart=0) and replaced them with new ones; Steve himself would make [outrageously](http://www.applematters.com/article/april-30-2004-steve-jobs-dismisses-an-ipod-with-video-support/) [opinionated](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Vq993Td6ys) [statements](http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2008/01/steve-jobs-peop/) about product features and then [completely](http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/10/12Apple-Unveils-the-New-iPod.html) [change](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo9cKe_Fch8) his [mind](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBooks) with the next generation. In some cases this may have been [calculated misinformation](http://www.ovguide.com/video/mahalos-jason-calcanis-on-steve-jobss-lies-922ca39ce10036ba0e11430040f47530), but in others he clearly [made an about-face](http://www.cultofmac.com/125180/steve-jobs-was-originally-dead-set-against-third-party-apps-for-the-iphone/) on something he had strongly believed.

Don’t act like you know when you don’t. It’s ok to not know right now. Wait and work until you do know, and recognize that what you knew yesterday may be holding you back today.

Cutting into the present

> “When you cut into the present the future leaks out.” – [William Burroughs](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-up_technique), on the “cut-up” technique of randomizing his writing.

10 minutes of gratitude

I think [watching this](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXDMoiEkyuQ) would be a pretty good way to start each day; filmmaker Louie Schwartzberg explores gratitude, mindfulness, and the beauty of the world we live in and people we live with:

Could also be seen as the sentimental counterpart to [Louis CK’s celebration of the modern world](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r1CZTLk-Gk).